No full Mac OS X support for Robson NAND accelerators?
Hard drives will soon have non-volatile Flash memory on them, which will act as a disk cache to further improve performance. The reason for this is that while processor performance has increased some thirty times over the past few years, disk performance on average has only scaled 1.3 times.As hard drives are mechanical devices, there's only so much you can do to speed them up. Solid-state drives are not yet ready for mass markets - capacities are too small and they consume more energy than normal drives - but Intel thinks that by slapping up to 2GB of NAND RAM on drives, it can substantially improve performance. Intel has code-named this "Robson", and it'll form part of its forthcoming Santa Rosa mobile platform.
Preliminary tests by Intel show a two-fold increase in application loading and a two-fold reduction in the time a system comes back from hibernation (when it has its memory contents paged out to disk, in a lower power state).
Not just that, but there are also small power savings to be had, Intel says, because you don't have to spin up the hard drive so often. This amounts to about half a Watt, but may improve once Robson is fully developed.
I think Robson sounds like very cool technology indeed, but couldn't help noticing that while Intel and Apple are best buddies at the moment, this particular technology seems to integrate the best with Windows Vista.
That's right: Robson is designed to support the ReadyDrive/ReadyBoost and SuperFetch technology in Vista. This allows users to plug in for instance USB memory sticks which Vista can use for paging instead of the hard drive. Not having to hit the comparatively slow mechanical drive gives Vista a substantial speed bost.
However, Apple doesn't currently have anything similar and when asked if Robson was aimed at Vista only, Intel would only say that it saw no reason why other platforms couldn't support it.
Full support for Robson, at the operating system level, is clearly an advantage, but will Apple have it too? That's not certain, nor is support for Linux. Intel has been quiet on Robson support for other operating systems since the technology was first touted, so it'll be interesting to see what happens with Apple. So far, it looks like only Windows Vista users will benefit fully from Robson something that is certain to anger Apple fans.
Other related posts:
Is this really the Teapot Tape recording?
Sign up now for NZNOG 12 in Christchurch
NZCS Newsline: history, asymmetry, testing and tax
Comment by Nathan Mercer, on 28-Sep-2006 20:56
ReadyBoost/ReadyDrive/SuperFetch is a big deal, it significantly improves the perf of Windows, while at the same time giving extra mobile battery life and reliability to HDDs.
Windows users don't have to wait 6 years between OS updates, during those ~6 years we've had 2 Service Pack updates, 3 versions of XP Media Center Edition and 2 versions XP Tablet PC edition. Oh and the updates are free. I can imagine the furore if Microsoft tried to charge for a significant OS update like XPSP2 ;)
Comment by John C. Randolph, on 29-Sep-2006 00:58
"ReadyBoost/ReadyDrive/SuperFetch is a big deal, it significantly improves the perf of Windows, while at the same time giving extra mobile battery life and reliability to HDDs."
So, it almost makes up for all the unneccessary paging caused by Windows' brain-dead memory managment? ( I mean, come on.. using FIFO for the paging algorithm, for heaven's sake?)
-jcr
Comment by cokemaster, on 29-Sep-2006 10:16
"Windows users don't have to wait 6 years between OS updates"
Neither did Apple users.
I'm fairly sure there will be a patch coming out sooner or later.
The question is does XP have FULL support for said devices...
Comment by John, on 13-Jan-2007 20:30
It seems to me that Robson is unlike the technologies you listed in Vista, b/c those are simply used as extensions of system memory, whereas the Robson technology basically treats that NAND as hard disk.
Am I wrong or is this not apples and oranges?
Comment by John, on 13-Jan-2007 20:33
It seems to me that Robson is unlike the technologies you listed in Vista, b/c those are simply used as extensions of system memory, whereas the Robson technology basically treats that NAND as hard disk.
Am I wrong or is this not apples and oranges?
Add a comment
Please note: comments that are inappropriate or promotional in nature will be deleted.
E-mail addresses are not displayed, but you must enter a valid e-mail address to confirm your comments.
Tag(s): 
Comment by John C. Randolph, on 28-Sep-2006 18:41
No big deal. Vista is still vaporware, and even if it does ship with a feature that Apple doesn't have, it's not like Mac users have to wait six years between OS updates.
-jcr